Write better.
Score higher.

Does the response fully address all parts of the task with a clear position, relevant ideas, and adequate extension?

• ✓Always write a clear thesis in Task 2 — examiners look for a position
• ✓For Task 1, include an overview paragraph — never skip it
• ✓Cover all bullet points in GT letters
• ✓Stay on topic — irrelevant content lowers your TA score

Is the response logically organised with smooth progression? Are linking words used accurately without being mechanical?

• ✓Each paragraph should have one clear central idea
• ✓Use cohesive devices naturally — not just 'Firstly, Secondly, Finally'
• ✓Reference words (this, these, such) show cohesion without repetition
• ✓Topic sentences should preview the paragraph's argument

Is there a wide range of vocabulary used with precision? Are there attempts at less common words, even if occasionally inaccurate?

• ✓Paraphrase the question prompt — never copy it word for word
• ✓Use collocations naturally: 'a significant increase', not 'a big go-up'
• ✓Vary noun forms: 'pollution', 'pollutants', 'polluted areas'
• ✓Minor spelling errors matter less than lexical range

Is there a variety of complex structures used with accuracy? A few errors are acceptable if they don't impede communication.

• ✓Use a mix of simple, compound, and complex sentences
• ✓Conditional sentences (If…, unless…) show range without risk
• ✓Passive voice suits academic writing — especially Task 1 process diagrams
• ✓Subject-verb agreement errors are penalised heavily at Band 6+